What is wrong with climate change journalism?
Published: 6 April 2026
Dominic Hinde reflects on the failure of contemporary journalism to reckon with the planetary consequences of climate change.
About ten years ago I was in a conference centre in the centre of Reykjavik, Iceland, watching French President Francois Hollande make a speech to assembled diplomats and journalists about the acute need to tackle climate change. Hollande and his entourage had just returned from a helicopter trip to a melting glacier that was set to disappear completely in the coming decades, one of several in Iceland that are entering their final illness.
Crouched on the floor of the conference centre in the press zone with my laptop, I looked around at the assembled group of journalists who had been sent to track their national delegations.
The French had VIP access to Hollande and were ferried around in his wake, but there were also Americans, Canadians, Germans, Spaniards, Koreans and Chinese dispatched to report on what was happening. Each of us was telling a slightly different story, whilst none of us were able to tell the whole story.
Climate reporting often fragments crises into stories, beats, and national interests, when the crisis itself is systemic, interconnected, and planetary.
From fieldwork to theory
Fast forward a decade and climate change has grown demonstrably worse as carbon emissions have continued to climb. Shortly after my trip to Iceland I started working on the book that would become Journalism in the Anthropocene, an attempt to combine my experience of working as a climate journalist with my academic training in communication, the social sciences and the environmental humanities.
In many ways it began as I stood trying to remain upright in the press scrum so I could send the footage back to my employers in London and Washington. What, exactly, was I doing there? The money wasn’t good enough to justify spending a week in Reykjavik listening to people talk about ice and shipping lanes.
The Australian journalism theorist John Hartley said that journalism was the primary sense making practice of modernity, and in a similar vein the sociologist of time and risk Barbara Adam says that it falls to journalism to produce what she labels ‘popular social theory’, a quote that became a framework for the project as a whole.
The problem is that journalists do not always understand the world they are making sense of. Even when they go in with good intentions and eyes open, they are pulled one way or another by gatekeepers and the economic demands of media work. And this is where it gets interesting.
Journalism as sense-making in modernity
Journalism as we know it has emerged in lockstep with the technological and material growth of global economy since the industrial revolution.
It is not just some external observer able to turn away and move on after saying its bit, but an integral part of earth history itself, what has generally come to be termed the Anthropocene.
Now the Anthropocene term itself is highly contested by social and earth scientists alike, but what is most interesting is the so-called Great Acceleration in capital, technology and urban life since the second world war that defines the world we live in today, the media included.
What Journalism in the Anthropocene does is situate journalism as something more than a representational practice in all of this. Media makes modernity and makes the future, whilst participating in the present.
At the same time, journalism has been locked in a death spiral for some time. The announcement recently that the Washington Post would be cutting (though a massacre may be a better description) its culture and foreign reporting to focus on profitable sports and US politics coverage was the latest in a series of attacks on the diversity of the media ecosystem.
To borrow an idiom from biology and atmospheric physics, we are experiencing system collapse with no unified plan to bring public life back from the precipice, and we need a reliable public sphere more than ever.
The urgent need for a strong public sphere
To do that we need to forge new forms of global and local media that are strong, supported, and don’t merely compete in a race to the bottom.
Journalism in the Anthropocene begins with a discussion of the world’s first simultaneous satellite broadcast, a 1967 show called Our World led by the BBC and other public service broadcasters that didn’t shy away from the threat of conflict, environmental destruction and the oncoming future.
It’s naïve belief in a brotherhood of man bound together by global media seems woefully optimistic today, yet at its heart was the belief and recognition that we need to tell the global story every single day.
If climate change journalism is to matter, it must stop treating the crisis as a topic and start treating it as the context for all reporting.
This blog has been re-published through Creative Commons license with thanks to Transforming Society. The piece was first published in Transforming Society 20 February 2026, available here.
Journalism in the Anthropocene by Dominic Hinde is available here.
First published: 6 April 2026
<< Blog